Crime+Scene+Script

media type="custom" key="4713743" align="left"

My name is Detective Breslin. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene a two bedroom one bathroom beach house. The alleged victim was Felix Navidad, he did not have many friends and was not liked a lot, his parents died in a bungie jump accident.

The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Vera Cruise, Felix did not have many friends because he was not the brightest person you would meet.But his friends did know that he had some money and once he was gone they would get the money. Vera wanted the money. This suspect's guilt was confimed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The first piece of evidence collected was the cups of cola. It was found next to the body. The test performed was a pH test on the cola and fingerprits on the glass. The results of the test were that the pH# in Felix's cup was a nine and Alfredo's pH# was a 1-2. Regular cola has a four to five pH#. So Felix had something in his drink. This connects the suspect to the crime because the powder on Vera's shoes were on the ice cubes that went in Felix's cup.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was the note Vera wrote to Martha. The evidence was found in sectoin eight of the crime scene. The test performed was the hand writing test. The evidence found was on the back of a notepad. Vera had to have time to write this because it is indented on the cardboard. This connects the suspect to the crime because Vera wrote that she was glad it was over and she signed her name at the bottom of the letter. (The handwriting test proved Kendra wrote the note).

The next piece of evidence collected was the wool sweater fibers. The sweater was not found but the fibers from it were found in section 2, 3, and 4. The test performed was the burning test.The results of the test were that when they burned the fibers they turned to black and shiney ashes. This connects the suspect to the crime because Vera was wearing a wool sweater that day. (This only proves she was there).

Another piece of evidence collected was the fake blood. It was found in section 7 and 8. The test performed was a powder test. The results of the test were that the blood was fake and that it really is blood powder. This connects the suspect to the crime because Vera works in a lab with chemicals and there was powder on her shoes. (Why would she make fake blood? What does this have to do with the crime?)

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. Through out the day things got more and more intresting, first we find the cups then we find the note after we find the fibers we found fake blood. (You needed to explain, step-by-step, how she committed the crime that day.) Therefore, Vera committed the crime of poisening the ice cubes for Felix's money.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately.**__ || Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds. || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 79% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || __**Catchy and clever
 * ^  || __** Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.  **__ || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || __** The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  **__ || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || __**Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.**__  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || **__The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene.__** || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || __** Conclusion summarizes information.  **__ || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || __**Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.**__  || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || __**Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening.**__ || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.__**  || Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__**  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || __**All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.**__  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || __**Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.**__  || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || __** Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.  **__ || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.  __** || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || __**Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.**__  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 45/57